the التحليل التداولي للحوار القرآني في ضوء نظرية الأفعال الكلاميةعند أوستين وسيرل: إطار عملي تكاملي

Pragmatic Analysis of Quranic Dialogue in Light of Austin’s and Searle’s Speech Act Theory: An Integrated Practical Framework

Authors

  • Muhammad Hashimee Universiti Islam Selangor (UIS), MALAYSIA https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4550-4957
  • Azlan Shaiful Baharum Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM), MALAYSIA
  • Abdul Azim Mohamad Isa Universiti Teknologi MARA (UITM), MALAYSIA
  • Fahed Maromar Universiti Teknologi MARA (UITM), MALAYSIA https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9253-3992
  • Mohamed Imthiyaz Junoob Naleemiah Institute for Islamic Studies, SRI LANKA

Keywords:

Quranic Dialogue, Pragmatic, Analysis, Speech Act Theory, Austin, Searl

Abstract

This study analyses Quranic dialogue through pragmatic analysis using speech act theory as developed by Austin and Searle. This theory contributes to the analysis of pragmatic elements by facilitating the classification of speech acts and the evaluation of their felicity conditions, particularly in determining the success and failure of performative utterances in context. The analysis is applied to selected dialogues involving Prophet Moses in the Quran. This effort is directed towards applying an integrated pragmatic framework for the analysis of Quranic dialogue, with particular attention to methodological rigor and the validity of interpretive outcomes. The research problem stems from the observation that many pragmatic studies on Quranic dialogues remain largely theoretical, offering limited application of speech act theory to selected textual data. Even when applied, such studies often restrict their analysis to the classification of speech acts, without presenting a systematic procedural model that accounts for contextual dimensions, communicative functions, and the perlocutionary and felicity conditions of utterances. This limitation has led to critiques that existing pragmatic analyses of Quranic dialogue tend to be superficial and insufficient for producing a comprehensive interpretive reading of Quranic verses. This study concludes that applying the proposed pragmatic framework enables an effective and systematic analysis of the pragmatic structure of Quranic dialogue. Searle’s classifications of speech acts facilitate the identification of overlapping discourse functions, including directives, representatives, expressives, commissives, and declaratives, while Austin’s felicity conditions evaluate success and failure of utterances in context.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Muhammad Hashimee, Universiti Islam Selangor (UIS), MALAYSIA

    Muhammad Hashimee is an academic in Arabic language studies with teaching and research experience at Fakulti Sains Sosial, Universiti Islam Selangor (UIS). He holds a Master’s degree in Arabic Linguistics from the International Islamic University Malaysia, where his thesis examined the psychological and social meanings of Quranic dialogue in Surah Yusuf. He also obtained a Bachelor’s degree in Da‘wah from Mujamma‘ Sheikh Ahmad Kuftaro, Damascus, with Arabic as his minor field of study. His academic profile reflects a strong engagement with Arabic language teaching, Qur’anic discourse, semantics, sociolinguistics, Arabization, and language education. His research involvement includes studies on Arabic teacher competency in Malaysia and communication issues in social media. He has also produced journal articles, proceedings, and Arabic language learning books, while serving as an editor and journal reviewer.

  • Azlan Shaiful Baharum, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM), MALAYSIA

    Assoc. Prof. Dr. Azlan bin Shaiful Baharum is an academic in Arabic language studies at the Faculty of Major Language Studies, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia. His scholarly background is grounded in Arabic language studies, with a PhD in Arabic Language Studies, a Master’s degree in Arabic Linguistics, and a Bachelor’s degree in Arabic Language and Literature. His area of expertise includes language in time and space, particularly historical linguistics and dialectology. Dr. Azlan has developed a strong research profile in Arabic language education, semantic rhetoric, Qur’anic language, Islamic literature, language errors, communication, and the integration of Naqli and Aqli knowledge. His recent research also reflects growing engagement with artificial intelligence in Arabic pedagogy, including AI-assisted speaking modules, AI literacy among lecturers, and AI-supported Arabic grammar learning. In addition to supervising postgraduate research, he has contributed extensively through journal articles, proceedings, books, chapters, consultation work, innovation projects, and academic advisory roles at national and university levels.

  • Abdul Azim Mohamad Isa, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UITM), MALAYSIA

    Dr. Abdul Azim bin Mohamad Isa is an academic at the Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA, with expertise in Arabic linguistics, phonetics, phonology, and prosody. He obtained his doctorate in Arabic Linguistic and Language Development from Universiti Ibnu Tofail, Kenitra, Morocco, where he also completed his Master’s degree in the same field. His undergraduate training was in Fundamental Studies, specializing in Arabic Studies, at Mohammed V–Agdal University. Dr. Abdul Azim’s research profile reflects sustained engagement with Arabic phonological analysis, Arabic reading patterns, tajwid-based language learning, Arabic communication, vocabulary acquisition, and technology-enhanced Arabic pedagogy. His active research includes studies on communication barriers among Arabic language students interacting with Arab tourists and immersive Arabic learning through virtual reality. His completed projects further demonstrate interest in e-learning, cultural values, Arabic speaking modules, and Arabic language models for professional communication. His publications cover phonology, pragmatics, Qur’anic language, Arabic prepositions, learner motivation, communication strategies, and VR-based vocabulary learning.

  • Fahed Maromar, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UITM), MALAYSIA

    Dr. Fahed Maromar is an academic affiliated with the Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA. He holds a Doctor of Philosophy in Arabic Linguistic Studies, a Master of Education in Teaching Arabic to Non-Arabic Speakers, and a Bachelor of Human Sciences in Arabic Language and Literature from the International Islamic University Malaysia. His academic specialization is situated within the humanities, particularly linguistics and literature, with applied linguistics identified as his principal area of expertise. His research interests demonstrate a strong orientation toward Arabic language pedagogy, pragmatic analysis, cross-cultural communication, speech acts, Arabic rhetoric, and learner motivation. Dr. Fahed’s active research includes studies on the history and development of tasawwuf and request strategies in Malay and Arab Emirati communication from a cross-cultural pragmatic perspective. His publications further reflect engagement with apology strategies in Arabic dramatic discourse, teaching Arabic for professional purposes, virtual communication with native speakers, Arabic culture learning, and pragmatic approaches to Arabic language use.

  • Mohamed Imthiyaz Junoob, Naleemiah Institute for Islamic Studies, SRI LANKA

    Mohamed Imthiyaz Abdul Junoob is a Sri Lankan academic whose scholarly involvement is closely associated with Arabic language education, particularly the development of speaking skills among learners in higher Islamic education. His academic work is represented in a Master’s thesis submitted to the International Islamic University Malaysia in 2015, entitled [The Effectiveness of Educational Techniques in Developing Arabic Speaking Skills: Jamiah Naleemiah Islamiah in Sri Lanka as a Model]. The study focuses on Arabic language teaching at Jamiah Naleemiah Islamiah, an important higher educational institution for the Muslim minority community in Sri Lanka, and examines the teaching techniques used to enhance students’ Arabic speaking proficiency. His research applies descriptive and analytical approaches, including questionnaire-based analysis of teachers’ and students’ views. The study concludes that teaching techniques require further improvement to strengthen Arabic language proficiency among learners, positioning his academic contribution within Arabic pedagogy, applied linguistics, and language skill development in the Sri Lankan Islamic education.

References

‘Abd al-Ḥaqq, Ṣ. I. (1993). Al-Taḥlīl al-lughawī ‘inda madrasat Ūksfūrd. Cairo, Egypt: Dār al-Tanwīr li-l-Ṭibā ‘ah wa al-Nashr.

Al-Ḥumaydānī, Ḥ. (1987). Al-Ittijāhāt al-sīmiyūlūjiyyah al-mu‘āṣirah. Beirut, Lebanon: Manshūrāt Ifrīqiyā al-Sharq.

Al-Jābirī, S. Ḥ. (2023). Al-Siyāq al-tadāwulī wa-binā’ al-ma‘nā fī shi‘r Abī Tammām: Fatḥ ‘Ammūriyyah ikhtiyāran. Majallat Kulliyyat al-Tarbiyah, 52, 62-89. https://doi.org/10.31185/eduj.Vol52.Iss1.3622.

Al-Zuḥaylī, W. (2001). Al-Tafsīr al-wasīṭ. Damascus, Syria: Dār al-Fikr.

Austin, J. L. (1970). Quand dire, c’est faire. France, Paris: Édition du Seuil.

Austin, J. L. (1976). How to do things with words. United Kingdom, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Darqāwī, K. (2017). Al-Hiwār āliyyat al-iqnāʿ fī al-khiṭāb al-ṣūfī. Majallat al-Muḥtarif li-‘Ulūm al-Riyāḍah wa al-ʿUlūm al-Insāniyyah wa al-Ijtimā‘iyyah, 3(2), 43-67. Retrieved from https://asjp.cerist.dz/en/article/154841.

Fan Dāyk, F. (2001). ‘Ilm al-naṣṣ: Madkhal mutadākhil al-takhaṣṣuṣāt. Cairo, Egypt: Dār al-Qāhirah.

Farḥān, B. Ḥ. (2020). Al-Qiṣṣah al-Qurʾāniyyah: Dirāsah taḥlīliyyah: Qiṣṣat Mūsā ‘alayhi al-salām anmūdhajan. Majallat al-Ādāb, 133, 24-53. Retrieved from https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-969573.

Ḥammūd, M. (2021). Af‘āl al-kalām al-ta‘bīriyyah fī al-Qur’ān al-karīm: Suwar al-Ḥawāmīm anmūdhajan. Majallat al-‘Ulūm al-Tarbawiyyah wa-al-Dirāsāt al-Islāmiyyah, 7(12), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.55074/hesj.v7i17.306.

Hudā, ʿA. G. (2023). Al-Ḥiwār al-nisā’ī fī al-Qur’ān al-karīm: Dirāsah lughawiyyah fī ḍaw‘ naẓariyyat al-af‘āl al-kalāmiyyah. Majallat Fīlūlūjī, 12(79), 8-27. Retrieved from http://search.mandumah.com/Record/1462856.

Hudā, S. (2024). Af‘āl al-kalām: Dirāsah taḥlīliyyah fī āy min al-Qur’ān al-karīm. Lark Journal, 16(4), 116–139. https://doi.org/10.31185/lark.3813.

Hudaym, ʿĀ. (2022). Af‘āl al-ta‘abbud fī al-Qur’ān al-karīm: Sūrat al-Fātiḥah anmūdhajan. Majallat al-Miʿyār, 26(63), 21-30. Retrieved from https://asjp.cerist.dz/en/article/177485.

Ḥuwaylī, N. (2023). Al-Āliyyāt al-tadāwuliyyah wa-al-balāghiyyah fī khiṭāb al-Qur’ān al-karīm: Sūrat Yūsuf anmūdhajan. Majallat al-Mumārasāt al-Lughawiyyah, 14(1), 64-78. Retrieved from https://asjp.cerist.dz/en/article/219176.

Ibn ‘Āshūr, M. al-Ṭ. (1984). Tafsīr al-taḥrīr wa al-tanwīr. Tunisia, Tunis: Al-Dār al-Tūnisiyyah li-al-Nashr.

Ibn Jinnī, A. F. (2008). Al-Khaṣā’iṣ. Cairo, Egypt: Dār al-Ḥadīth.

Ifhām, A. Ḥ. al-Q. (2022). Al-Ishāriyyāt fī Sūrat Maryam. Majallat al-Ādāb lil-Dirāsāt al-Lughawiyyah wa al-Adabiyyah, 8(1), 200-228. https://doi.org/10.53286/arts.v1i8.295.

Kamarudin, M. H., & Mustapha, N. H. (2022). Dalālāt al-wāw wa-al-fā’ fī qiṣaṣ al-sābiqīn min Sūrat al-Kahf wa-āthāruhumā fī al-tanāsub wa-al-muddah al-zamāniyyah. Al-Isyad: Journal of Islamic and Contemporary Issues, 7(2), 790-806. https://doi.org/10.53840/alirsyad.v7i1.288.

Layth, S. (2023). Al-I‘tidhār fī al-Qur’ān al-karīm: Dirāsah tadāwuliyyah. Majallat Kulliyyat al-Taʿlīm, 54(1), 18-32. https://doi.org/10.31185/eduj.Vol54.Iss1.3718.

Marina, S. (2014). Austin on language and action. Sydney, Australia: Palgrave Macmillan.

Mas‘ūd, S. (2010). Al-Tadāwuliyyah ‘inda ‘ulamā’ al-‘Arab. Beirut, Lebanon: Dār al-Ṭalī‘ah.

Muḥammad, ‘A. ‘A. (2022). Al-af‘āl al-kalāmiyyah al-inkāriyyah fī Sūrat al-A‘rāf. Majallat al-ʿUlūm al-Insāniyyah, 10(3), 24-36. https://doi.org/10.26436/hjuoz.2022.10.3.939.

Muḥammad, Ḥ. ‘A. ‘A. (2011). ‘Ilm al-lughah al-ḥadīth. Beirut, Lebanon: Maktabat al-Ādāb.

Naḥlah, M. A. (2002). Āfāq jadīdah fī al-baḥth al-lughawī al-muʿāṣir. Beirut, Lebanon: Dār al-Ma‘rifah al-Jāmi‘iyyah.

Nu‘mān, B. (2006). Naḥwa naẓariyyah lisāniyyah ‘Arabiyyah li-l-af‘āl al-kalāmiyyah. Majallat al-Lughah wa al-Adab, 11(1), 169-203. Retrieved from https://asjp.cerist.dz/en/article/111225.

Rajab, Y. (2023). Al-binā’ al-lughawī li-āyāt al-ḥiwār fī al-Qur’ān al-karīm: Dirāsah fī al-lughah wa-al-dalālah (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Jāmi‘at al-Jazā’ir).

Ṣabāḥ, Ḥ. (2017). Afʿāl al-kalām fī sūrat Maryam (Unpublished Master’s thesis, Jāmiʿat al-ʿArabī ibn Muhaydī).

Ṣadūq, Ḥ. S. (2018). Naẓariyyat af‘āl al-kalām bayna al-turāth al-‘Arabī wa-al-manāhij al-ḥadīthah (Unpublished Master’s thesis, Jāmiʿat al-Duktūr Mawlāy al-Ṭāhir).

Salīmah, J. (2021). Al-Muqārabah al-tadāwuliyyah li-l-khiṭāb al-Qur’ānī fī al-buḥūth al-akādīmiyyah: Af‘āl al-kalām namūdhajan. Majallat Ishkālāt fī al-Lughah wa al-Adab, 4(2), 219-235. Retrieved from https://asjp.cerist.dz/en/article/152827.

Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and meaning. Melbourne, Australia: Cambridge University Press.

Ūshān, ʿA. Ā. (2000). Al-Siyāq wa-al-naṣṣ al-shi‘rī: Min al-binyah ilā al-qirā’ah. Cairo, Egypt: Dār al-Thaqāfah.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-25

Issue

Section

Arabic

How to Cite

the التحليل التداولي للحوار القرآني في ضوء نظرية الأفعال الكلاميةعند أوستين وسيرل: إطار عملي تكاملي: Pragmatic Analysis of Quranic Dialogue in Light of Austin’s and Searle’s Speech Act Theory: An Integrated Practical Framework. (2026). Al-Irsyad: Journal of Islamic and Contemporary Issues, 1669-1694. https://al-irsyad.uis.edu.my.kuisjournal.com/index.php/alirsyad/article/view/601

Similar Articles

1-10 of 121

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.