Shaḥādah in Syariah court evidence statutes in Malaysia: its foundation and legal sources
Syahadah dalam statut keterangan mahkamah syariah di Malaysia: asas dan sumber perundangan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53840/alirsyad.v2i1.25الكلمات المفتاحية:
syahadah، statut keterangan mahkamah syariah، keadilan، bayyinah، asas، sumber perundanganالملخص
Shahādah or testimony, is one of the strong types of evidence like an admission that should be reported by fulfilling the strict conditions without ignoring the elements of justice and public interest. Shahādah as provided in the Malaysian Syariah Court Evidence Statutes (SCES), is derived from the results of a detailed study of the lawmakers on Syariah legal rulings and the books of fiqh on various mazhab to fit in SCES. This is in contrast with other provisions that were adapted from the Malaysian Evidence Act 1950, like documentary evidence, examination of witnesses, and qarīnah through the process of modifying civil law with the principles of Islamic law of evidence. As shahādah in SCES was derived from Islamic law and the fiqh books, the issue arises when the conditions of shahādah seem to be quite difficult to fulfill to be admissible. Hence, most of the evidence tendered and testified in the Syariah court is only accepted as bayyinah by adopting the view of Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyyah. This study analyzes the foundation and source of codifying the relevant provisions of shahādah in SCES Malaysia. Based on interviews and library research, the authors found that shahādah under SCES refers basically to the Islamic legal rulings, which mostly come from Shāfi‘ī mazhab also known as the main reference of Islamic law in Malaysia. However, by resorting to the flexible approach of selecting views from various Islamic schools of law to fit in SCES, other views of fiqh are also acceptable in some situations.
التنزيلات
المراجع
‘Abdul Karim, Z. (1983). Nizam a-Qada’. Baghdad: Matb’ah al-Ma’ani.
‘Alauddin Abi Bakr, M. K. H. (t.th.). Badai’ al-Sanai’ Fi Tartib al-Sharai’. Kaherah: Matba’ah al-Imam.
Abi Bakr ‘Uthman, M. S. D. 1995. I’anah al-Talibin. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.
Abi Ishaq, I. S. (1995). al-Muhadhab. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
Ahmad ‘Abdul Mun’im, B. (1965). Min Turuq al-Ithbat Fi al-Shari’ah wa fi al-Qanun. Kaherah: Dar al-Fikr.
Ahmad Fathi, B. (1983). Nazariyat al-Ithbat Fi al-Fiqh al-Jina’i al-Islami. Beirut: Dar al-Shuruq.
Ahmad Mohamed, I. (2000). The Administration of Islamic Laws in Malaysia Kuala Lumpur: IKIM.
Akmal Hidayah, H. (1999). The Law of Competency, Compellability And Credibility of Witness: a Comparative Study of Evidence Act 1950 And Islamic Law. MCL Thesis. Kuliyyah of Law, International Islamic University, Malaysia.
Al-Khatib, M. S. (t.th.) Al-Iqna’. Jil. 1. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.
Al-Shafi’i, M. I. (2009). Al-Umm. Jil. 5. Beirut: Dar al-Fiqh.
Al-Syarbini, S. M. K. (2006). Mughni al-Muhtaj. Jil. 6. Kaherah: Darul Hadith.
Al-Zuhayli, W. (1996). Usul al-Fiqh al-Islami. Jil. 2. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.
Al-Zuhayli, W. (1997). Al-Fiqh al-Islami wa Adillatuh. Jil. 8. Damsyik: Dar al-Fikr.
Amir Husin, M. N., Zuliza, K. & Che Maryam, A. (2006). Kesaksian Dalam Undang-undang Keterangan Islam. Dm. S. Z. Md. Nor, et al. (Pnyt.). Al-Syariah Jilid 3: Undang-undang Keterangan Islam. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa Dan Pustaka.
Burhanuddin Abi al-Hasan ‘Ali, A. F. M. (t.th.). Al-Hidayah Sharh Bidayah al-Mubtadi. Jil. 2. Beirut: Sharikah Dar al-Arqam bin Abi al-Arqam.
C. R. Tyser., D.G. Demetriades, & Ismail Haqqi, E. (2006). The Mejelle. Petaling Jaya: The Other Press.
Hamid, J. (2007). Tazkiyah al-Syuhud. Dlm. N.Hussin et. al., Undang-undang Islam: Jenayah, Keterangan dan Prosedur. Jil. 13. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Ibnu al-Humam. (1995). Sharhu Fathul Qadir. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
Ibnu al-Qayyim al-Jawziyyah. (2002). Al-Turuq al-Hukmiyyah Fi al-Siyasah al-Shar’iyyah. Kaherah: Darul Hadith.
Ibnu al-Qayyim al-Jawziyyah. (2002). I’lam al-Muwaqi’in. Kaherah: Dar al-Hadith.
Ibnu Farhun. (1301H). Tabsirah al-Hukkam Fi Usul al-‘Aqdiyyah wa Manahij al-Ahkam. Jil. 2. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
Ibnu Hazm. (1984) al-Muhalla bi a-Athar. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
Ibnu Qudama. (1994). al-Mughni wa Sharhu al-Kabir. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.
Ibnu Rushd. (2009). Sharh Bidayah al-Mujtahid wa Nihayah al-Muqtasid. Jilid ke-4. Kaherah: Dar al-Salam.
Mahmud Saedon, A. O. (1991). Undang-undang Keterangan Islam. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa & Pustaka.
Mahmud Saedon, A. O. (1995). Undang-undang Keterangan Mahkamah Syariah: Satu Analisis. Dlm. Abdul Monir Yaacob (Ed.). Undang-undang Keterangan Dan Prosedur di Mahkamah, Kuala Lumpur: IKIM.
Mahmud Saedon, A. O. (2000). Pendekatan Siyasah Syar’iyyah Dalam Pentadbiran Negara. Jurnal Undang-undang IKIM, 4(1), 81.
Muhammad al-Zuhayli. (2008). Fiqhul Qada’ wa al-Da’wa wal Ithbat. UAE: Jami’ah al-Shariqah.
Muhammad Siraj. (1988). Usul al-Fiqh al Islami. Iskandariyah: Mansha’ah al-Ma’arif.
Ruzman, M. N. (2008). Kedudukan Bayyinah, Syahadah dan Qarinah Dalam Penggubalan Undang-undang Keterangan Islam Di Malaysia. Jurnal Syariah, 16, 345-366.
Ruzman Md. Noor. (2008). Kesaksian Dalam Konteks Undang-undang Keterangan Mahkamah Syariah di Malaysia: Analisis Dari Perspektif Mazhab Syafie. Jurnal Fiqh, 5, 143-167.
Ruzman, M. N. (2008). Kajian Semula Terhadap Undang-undang Keterangan Islam. Prosiding Seminar Semakan Semula Korpus Undang-undang Islam di Malaysia: Keperluan Dan Cabaran, IKIM. 1-2 April 2008. April 1-2, 2008.
Shamsuddin al-Shaikh, M. D. (t.th.). Hashiyah al-Dasuqi ‘Ala al-Sharh al-Kabir. Mesir: Mustafa al-Babi al-Halabi.
Shamsuddin Muhammad, A. A. H. (1984). Nihayah al-Muhtaj Ila Sharhi al-Minhaj. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.
Taqiyuddin Abi al-Baqa Muhammad, A. I. N. (2005). Sharhu Muntaha al-Iradat. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
التنزيلات
منشور
الرخصة
الحقوق الفكرية (c) 2017 Azizah Mohd Rapini, Ruzman Md. Noor
هذا العمل مرخص بموجب Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with al-Irsyad: Journal of Islamic and Contemporary Issues agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
al-Irsyad: Journal of Islamic and Contemporary Issues use a variety of waivers and licenses that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
- Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/(default)
- Creative Commons CC-Zero Waiver, http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
- Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1-0/
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.
Open Data and Software Publishing and Sharing
The journal strives to maximize the replicability of the research published in it. Authors are thus required to share all data, code, or protocols underlying the research reported in their articles. Exceptions are permitted but have to be justified in a written public statement accompanying the article.
Datasets and software should be deposited and permanently archived in appropriate, trusted, general, or domain-specific repositories (please consult http://service.re3data.org and/or software repositories such as GitHub, GitLab, Bioinformatics.org, or equivalent). The associated persistent identifiers (e.g. DOI, or others) of the dataset(s) must be included in the data or software resources section of the article. Reference(s) to datasets and software should also be included in the reference list of the article with DOIs (where available). Where no domain-specific data repository exists, authors should deposit their datasets in a general repository such as ZENODO, Dryad, Dataverse, or others.
Small data may also be published as data files or packages supplementary to a research article, however, the authors should prefer in all cases a deposition in data repositories.
كيفية الاقتباس
